Unmasking The Face of Death

by Michael Ross


"When we abolished the punishment for treason that you should be hanged and then cut down while still alive, then disemboweled while still alive, and then quartered, we did not abolish that punishment because we sympathized with traitors, but because we took the view that this was a punishment no longer consistent with our self-respect."

These words, spoken by Lord Chancellor Gardiner during the 1965 death penalty abolition debates in the British Parliament, illustrate the feeling felt by most individuals opposed to capital punishment. It's not sympathy towards the murderer that we feel; indeed, most of us feel a great deal of anger and revulsion towards all murderers and their actions. Our objection is that it is a complete renunciation of all that is embodied in our concept of humanity. Or, simply put, executions degrade us all.

In today's society, the execution process is far removed from most individual citizens. We may or may not be aware of the criminal acts that put an individual on death row-and even then usually only through sensationalized press accounts-but very few of us know of the human being whom society has condemned to death. And even fewer of us have ever witnessed, or will ever witness, an actual execution. This deliberate dehumanization of the whole process makes it much easier for us to distance ourselves from capital punishment and to accept it "as something government does," which allows us not to be individually responsible for the consequences of such actions.

But we are responsible, for our state and federal governments are killing people in our names. And we should be made aware of the human side of these executions. To do so I would like to share with you an extract from an affidavit by David Bruce, an attorney who stayed with a condemned man, Terry Roach, during the last hours before his execution and actually witnessed the execution.

I assisted with Terry Roach's defense during the last month before his execution, and I spent the last four hours with Terry Roach in his cell when he was electrocuted on January 10, 1986.

Although I have known Terry slightly for several years, meeting him in the course of visits to see other inmates on South Carolina's death row, my first long conversation with Terry occurred less than a month before his death. An execution date had already been set, and he seemed frightened and very nervous. I was struck at that time by how obviously mentally retarded Terry was . . . I had known from following his case through the courts that he had been diagnosed as mildly mentally retarded, but I was still surprised at his slack-jawed and slow way of speaking, and at the evident lack of understanding of much of what we were telling him about the efforts that were underway to persuade Governor Riley to grant clemency.

The next time that I would see Terry was on the night of his execution. The lawyers who had worked on his case for the past eight years were at the Supreme Court in Washington, so I had decided to look in on Terry that night after his family had had to leave for the last time, to see if I could help him with anything or just keep him company. When I arrived, he had decided to ask me to stay with him through the night and accompany him when he was taken to the chair. So along with Marie Deans, a paralegal and counselor who works with condemned prisoners in Virginia, I stayed.

Although Terry was twenty-five years old by the time of his death, he seemed very childlike. In general, his demeanor and his reactions to the people around him appeared to me to comport with the finding, made at his last psychological evaluation, that his IQ was 70-a score that placed his intellectual functioning at about the level of a twelve-year-old child. When his family minister showed him some prayers from the Bible that they would read together, Terry asked him which ones he thought would be especially likely to help him into heaven; his questions about this seemed based on the childish assumption that one prayer was likely to "work" better than another, and that he just needed some advice about which ones would work best. Later in the night, he asked me to read him a long letter about reincarnation that a man from California had sent to him just that day; he listened to the letter with wonder, like a small child at bedtime, trusting and uncritical. Both Marie and I were struck by how calmed Terry seemed by the sound of a voice reading to him in the resonant cell, and we spent much of the remaining time reading to him while he listened, gazing at the reader with rapt attention.

He had a final statement which his girlfriend had helped him write. When I arrived that night, the statement was on three small scraps of paper, in his girlfriend's handwriting. I copied it out for him, and got him to read it out loud a few times. No matter how many times he tried, the word "enemies" came out "emenies." He kept practicing it, but pronouncing the written word just seemed beyond his capabilities. Still, he seemed to like the rehearsal: like everything we did that night, it filled the time and acknowledged that he was doing something very difficult.

Terry was a very passive young man, and that showed all through the night. Although he was obviously frightened, he was as cooperative as possible with the guards, and he tried to pretend that all of the ritual preparation-the shaving of his head and right leg, the prolonged rubbing in of electrical conducting gel-was all a normal sort of thing to have happen. He wanted the approval of those around him, and he seemed well aware that this night he could gain everyone's approval by being brave and keeping his fear at bay.

Still, when the warden appeared in the cell door at 5:00 a.m. and read the death warrant, while Terry stood, each wrist immobilized in a manacle known as the "claw," his left leg began to shake in large, involuntary movements. After that everything happened quickly. I walked to the chair with him, and talked to him as much as I could. He wanted me to read his statement, but I told him that he ought to try and I'd read it if he couldn't. His voice was only a little shaky, and he managed quite well, except for "emenies." After he had repeated the name of a friend of mine who had recently died, and whom he had offered to look up for me when he got to heaven, I left him and walked to the witness area, where I gave him a "thumbs-up" sign. He signaled back with his fingers, as much as the straps permitted. We signaled to each other once more just before the mask was pulled down over his face.

A few seconds later the current hit. Terry's body snapped back and held frozen for the whole time that the current ran through his body. After a few seconds, steam began to rise from his body, and the skin on his thighs just above the electrode began to distend and blister. His fists were clenched and very white. His body slumped when the power was turned off, and jerked erect again when it resumed. When he was declared dead, several guards wrestled his body out of the chair and onto a stretcher, while taking care to conceal his face (no longer covered by the mask) from the view of the witnesses and me by covering it with a sheet. I left the death house at about this time in the company of the warden. As we stepped out of the building, I heard the whoops of a crowd of about 150 or 200 demonstrators who had apparently come to celebrate the execution, and who were yelling and cheering outside the prison gates.

Executions degrade us all. They are held in the middle of the night, in the dark, away from us all, to hide what they really are. The men who are condemned to death are dehumanized by the state and by the press, to make it easier to carry out their executions. The public is kept as far away as possible from the whole process to keep them from seeing that human beings, real flesh and blood, real people, are being put to death. That is the only way that any state or government can continue with executions without the public demanding their eradication.

Our politicians often leap at the chance that the death penalty gives them to sound tough on crime. But what they are really doing is playing on the strong feelings of anxiety, frustration and anger that most people feel towards the seemingly uncontrollable plague of crime that our country is currently experiencing. However, such rhetoric in reality detracts from the real work at hand of developing genuine programs of crime prevention and control. As such, the death penalty becomes the perfect political red herring-a program that sounds tough on crime and helps to create a false sense of security, but one that in all reality saps our already limited resources.

There are acceptable alternatives to capital punishment that are more in line with the values of our supposedly enlightened and humanistic society. The state is supposed to be the pillar of our ideals, and its institutions should emulate the best values of our society. And are not the greatest of these values our compassion, our concern for human rights, and our capacity for mercy? By continuing to conduct executions, aren't we undermining the very foundations of our greatness? As Zimbabwe Poet Chenjerai Hove wrote: "The death sentence is abominable, as abominable as the crime itself. Our state must be based on love, not hatred and victimization. Our penal code must be based on rehabilitation rather than annihilation." For no legal order can sustain itself unless it reflects an underlying moral order of society.

There are suitable alternatives. Individuals who are a danger to society must be removed from society. Society has the right to protect itself, there is no question about that. If rehabilita-tion is not possible or is not a consideration, then that removal must be made permanent. But it need not be excessive.

Those who favor the abolition of the death penalty do not advocate releasing convicted murderers into society. The choice is not between the death penalty and unconditional release, but between the death penalty and a meaningful life sentence. Life without the possibility of parole, or natural life sentences, meet the necessary requirements of society.

Feelings of retribution, vengeance, blood atonement, and the like are difficult feelings to suppress. Perhaps some individuals "deserve" to die. But in light of suitable alternatives, such as natural life sentences, is society in general paying too high a price when it executes its own citizens? Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Thurgood Marshall once wrote: "I cannot agree that the American people have been so hardened, so embittered that they want to take the life of one who performs even the basest criminal act knowing that the execution is nothing more than bloodlust."

It is time for us to acknow-ledge the death penalty for what it really is rather than for what we wish it to be. By rejecting the simple solutions that compromise our values and undermine the fundamental principles of our society, we maintain the greatness of our country. For it is certainly true that by giving in to our basest emotions we lower ourselves to the level of the very persons that we wish to execute, and in the process weaken the moral fibers that bind and protect our society.

And while it is admittedly difficult at times, when we recognize the humanity of even the vilest criminals, when we acknowledge them as fellow human beings rather than as objects to be discarded, we pay ourselves the highest of tributes and celebrate our own humanity.

What can you do to help? There are several organizations working diligently to abolish capital punishment in America. They need your help and support. Please contact one of the following groups:

Amnesty International USA (Campaign to Abolish the Death Penalty) 322 Eighth Ave.; New York, NY 10001 Telephone 212-807-8400

American Civil Liberties Union (Capital Punishment Project) 122 Maryland Ave, NE Washington, DC 20002 Telephone 202-675-2319

National Coalition to Abolish the Death Penalty 918 "F" Street, NW, 6th Floor Washington, DC 20004 Telephone 202-347-2510

Catholics Against Capital Punishment P.O. Box #3125; Arlington, VA 22203 Telephone 703-522-5014

Murder Victims Families For Reconciliation 2093 Willow Creek Road; Portage, IN 46368 Telephone 219-763-2170

Michael Ross is a condemned man on Connecticut's death row. He has been on death row since June 1987. He is currently under a stay of execution pending the resolution of the appeal process. Michael Ross #127404, Death Row - Somers Prison, P.O. Box 100, Somers, CT 06071

Death Row Inmates By State

California 380
Texas 363
Florida 332
Pennsylvania 168
Illinois 162
North Carolina 128
Ohio 127
Oklahoma 119
Arizona 118
Alabama 117
Georgia 109
Tennessee 103
Missouri 83
Nevada 62
Mississippi 52
Indiana 50
South Carolina 50
Virginia 47
 Louisiana 41
Arkansas 40
Kentucky 27
Idaho 22
Delaware 15
Maryland 14
Oregon 14
Washington 13
US 13 (US = U.S. Government & Military.)
Nebraska 11
Utah 11
New Jersey 9
Montana 8
Connecticut 5
Colorado 3
New Mexico 1
South Dakota 1

There are 14 states without the death penalty.

Innocence and The Death Penalty

  • Since 1970, 48 people have been released from death row with evidence of their innocence. (Staff Report, House Judiciary Subcommittee on Civil & Constitutional Rights, October 1993.)
  • Researchers Radelet & Bedau found 23 cases since 1900 where innocent people were executed. (In Spite of Innocence, Northeastern University Press, 1992.)

Public Opinion and The Death Penalty

  • Public support for the death penalty drops to below 50% when voters are offered alternative sentences. More people would support life without parole plus restitution to the victim's family than would choose the death penalty.
  • Problems with the death penalty raise significant doubts in people's minds. 58% of those surveyed were concerned about the danger of executing innocent people. 48% had doubts due to racism in the application of the death penalty, 46% had doubts about the high costs, and 42% had doubts related to the failure of deterrence.

Death Penalty Information Center
1606 20th Street, N.W., Second Floor Washington, DC 20009

Financial Facts About The Death Penalty

  • The most comprehensive study in the country found that the death penalty costs North Carolina $2 million per execution over the costs of a non-death penalty murder case with a sentence of imprisonment for life. (Duke University, May 1993). On a national basis, these figures translate to an extra cost of half a billion dollars since 1976 for having the death penalty.
  • The death penalty costs California $90 million annually beyond the ordinary costs of the justice system-$78 million of this total is incurred at the trial level. (Sacramento Bee, 3/28/88.)
  • Florida spent an estimated $57 million on the death penalty from 1973 to 1988 to achieve 18 executions-that is an average of $3.2 million per execution. (Miami Herald, 7/10/88.)
  • In Texas, a death penalty case costs an average of $2.3 million, about three times the cost of imprisoning someone in a single cell at the highest security level for 40 years. (Dallas Morning News, 3/8/92.)


Table of Contents | 1994 Issues | Subscribe

Truth Seeker | Feedback | Freethought.com
Webmaster

Credit card Orders call: 800-321-9054 or fax: (619)676-0433
Or send check or money order to:
Truth Seeker / 16935 W. Bernardo Drive, Suite 103 / San Diego, CA 92127
$20.00 annual U.S. subscription ($35.00 international). Individual issues—$10.00 + $2.50 postage and handling
Or be a committed freethinker and send $35.00 for a two year subscription.

Truth Seeker is published by Truth Seeker Co., Inc. (ISSN 0041-3712) © 1996